1,021

(23 replies, posted in General)

Yes the shape distortion makes it harder to track…

Regarding the imaging hardware, the ideal results would be obtained with

  • high frame rate - more frames means the shape will change less from frame to frame and has less chance to disappear outside the search window.

  • high shutter speed - will better stop freeze the moving object as opposed of creating the blurry shape you have in your video.

Control of shutter speed is generally the hardest to get as camcorders/cameras/webcams are built to create movies pleasing to the eye when played back, and so for the vendors the blur is actually a feature rather than a bug mad

For the markers the plain circular shape you have is good. Avoid shapes that would not look the same when rotated, like a rectangle or a triangle. Another thing to experiment with would be to have another smaller circular disk, say half the size, inside the main one, with a contrasting colour.

The size of the target is also important, for that you can switch to the regular trajectory tool (right click in an empty area on the video), the inner rectangle is the actual target being tracked. The marker should take as much of its space as possible. (The outter rectangle is the search window).

Keep us posted with the experiments smile

1,022

(3 replies, posted in Bug reports)

The build number shouldn't be necessary since except in some very specific cases, there is only one instance of a particular version.
Some instances with similar version number can sometimes be built for testing of a new translation, a specific bugfix or feature. They don't spread and should be deleted and replaced as soon as the actual version is released. wink

Currently the fix is only at the source level in the source code repository.

The video format shouldn't have any bearing in the color issue, that information is stored in the KVA file.

1,023

(3 replies, posted in Bug reports)

OK, I've found the issue with position/size.
When a generic posture / custom tool is added manually, there is some code that scales it relatively to the image size, to give it a sensible size.

Unfortunately, the same bit of code is also run when the tool comes from a KVA, even though it has already been positioned and sized manually.

This impacts all custom tools, flipped or not. Simply saving and reloading will provoke a change in position and size. The more the image size is different from 800x600 (the reference canvas size for custom tools) the more this will be apparent.
(Fixed in dev version)

The fact that you loose the color still eludes me. I can open your KVA fine and the tool is green.

1,024

(5 replies, posted in General)

Oh, I added the video plugin for the forum by the way. Testing it with your video right now:

[video]http://youtu.be/2xmI7utNZNw[/video]

1,025

(23 replies, posted in General)

Hi,
You must right click the added skeleton itself, to get to its specific context menu. There you'll get another "Track path" option, which will track the points of the tool itself.

1,026

(5 replies, posted in General)

Nice smile
I think using markers is still important to get best results. Otherwise even if the points seem to be locked on target, they actually make some small movements around and the angles are not top accurate.

Thanks for the bug report!

1,027

(22 replies, posted in General)

jonh wrote:

If I may, the only observation I have is that with profile tool and genu tool you can't stretch the limb lengths like you can on the bike fit for instance.

Yes, this was on purpose… The goal of these two tools was to be able to quickly add a reference posture on the side of the image.

The typical use case is for example a podiatrist, to quickly overlay a "genu flexum" shape with the knees bending inwards, and keep it along the video for reference. In this regards the shape is simpler if it doesn't stretch.

Since the new tools are described in XML, the possibilities are endless, so I tried to have a range of examples with various applications.

Creating the same tools with stretchable limbs is quite easy. I'll try to finish the tutorial on how to go about creating a simple tool.

Thanks for the report!

For the new features like goniometer, etc. It's normal because the name of the tool is inside the XML file describing the tool. Currently translation of the name is not supported. There is no easy way to have the system be very dynamic and have all translations for the tool names. Unless we put the translations directly inside the description files themselves, at least for the embedded tools…

Regarding the "Lock the working zone" button, the issue is just with Spanish, it's quite strange actually. I guess the French string has been copied for reference and hasn't been changed. The string for "unlock" also has a problem: "Dévérouiller los terminales de la zona de trabajo"
So we need translations for these two:

  • Lock the Working Zone Boundaries

  • Unlock the Working Zone Boundaries

Ok thanks for the test. Found the problem, the tool was using the "display" (possibly stretched or squeezed) coordinates to compute the length label.
Saving to video should have given same results as during playback though, I'll have to double check that.

edit: Actually saving to video is the one that was giving you the right measure. The others are subject to the problem since the image is likely stretched or squeezed.

It sounds like a bug in the calibration/image stretch adaptation. Can you confirm the bug happens also with the regular line tool used for calibration and not just with the new horizontal distance tool?

1,031

(11 replies, posted in General)

Yes you have to enter the color name manually for now. I'll see if we can get the color picker back.

1,032

(11 replies, posted in General)

test, test2

[color=red]test[/color], [color=#6CAF12]test2[/color]

It seems to work for me. I admit I don't remember how it was working before, there was a color picker?
I'll check for the highlight color.

But the settings are not always available when in video mode…

1,034

(11 replies, posted in General)

The CSS problem with IE9 should be fixed, as well as avatars.

Could someone clarify the Aperture Priority AE and Shutter Priority AE settings ?

If I understand correctly, the "Shutter Speed Priority AE" would let you set the shutter speed manually and then the camera would set the aperture automatically based on ambiant light. I think all the Casio EX-ZR* series have these settings. That would allow one to set the shutter speed manually on the newer models?