Thanks for all the propositions !
About coining a new word for the function:
The good part is that it creates a recognizable name, and that it does not need to be translated between all languages.
The cons is that it is not obvious what the function will do before the user clicks on the menu or check the help file.
In this, way, I think it's best to have something that is the most descriptive possible. I would like the program to speak the same language as the user so there's no surprises.
We may use a brand new name when the feature to name is completely innovative and doesn't correspond to anything.
I'm also a fan of the early history of cinema
.
And that is why Chronophotography is already reserved for a future feature. It was a tremendous technique to decompose motion used by Muybridge and Etienne-Jules Marey in the 1880's.
I find this incredible how these guys were studying motion from photography more than a hundred years ago. They are totally forgotten in my opinion. A century later, we should have hardware that does that kind of stuff.
In trying to get as close as possible to describing the feature in actual words, I think "Overview" is pretty much spot on.
I have switched to that in the just-posted 0.8.6 experimental version, to try it out in the light.
Let me know if you have strong objections against it, otherwise I guess it's a keeper.

